What could Bayobe the largest oil spill since 1989's Exxon Valdez is unfolding in the East China Sea after a deadly and fiery collision between two vessels caused a tanker to sink. All 32 crew members are thought to have died aboard the Iranian vessel "Sanchi," which was carrying about 1 million barrels of condensate.
According to Bloomberg News, the ship was transporting hydrocarbon liquid that's a key ingredient for making petrochemicals, including jet fuel. It was headed to the port of Daesan, South Korea when it struck the transport ship "CF Crystal" off China's eastern coast.
SEE ALSO: This chatbot wants to cut through the noise on climate scienceThe tanker and its associated oil slick had been on fire for days after the collision. While the fire likely killed all aboard the ship, it was seen by environmental experts as a way to minimize the broader impacts of the spill, since the flames burned off the lightweight condensate on the ocean surface.
However, the fire is now out, and the ship has sunk, raising the possibility that the harmful cargo is going directly into the sea.
The cargo is different than the crude oil spilled by the Exxon Valdez in 1989, but if all the condensate were to leak into the ocean, it would rank as the biggest spill in decades.
Much remains unknown about the fate of the cargo, and therefore similar can be said about what the environmental impacts will be. Reports in recent days are not encouraging, since there is word of a rapidly spreading oil slick on the surface of the ocean. Citing Chinese authorities, Bloomberg reported that the spill expanded from 3.9 square miles to 52 square miles between Sunday and Monday local time.
An oil spill in the heavily trafficked East China Sea could have significant environmental repercussions. Humpback whales travel through that area, and heavily fished species such as mackerel and bluefin also spend time in that area.
“It is virtually certain that much of the condensate went into the sea in solution, and that toxic underwater hydrocarbon plume will injure marine life exposed to it,” Richard Steiner, an oil spill specialist based in Alaska, told Bloomberg. “Even the burned fraction will leave a toxic residue on the water.”
Ma Jun, a Chinese environmentalist, was quoted by CNN as saying the spill took place in one of the most productive fishing areas in the country, known as the Zhoushan fishing ground.
"We still need to keep an eye on how these contaminants might be carried by the ocean flow to have the impact on the fishing ground," Jun told CNN.
According to Greenpeace International, it's not clear how large this environmental disaster will be, since the amount of condensate that leaked into the water is unknown.
"A major concern is that, now that the tanker has sunk, any condensate which did not yet burn off could continue to leak underwater, disperse and break down quite quickly, significantly complicating clean up operations," the environmental advocacy organization stated in a Jan. 15 fact sheet.
(Editor: {typename type="name"/})
Best Samsung deal: Save $60 on 64GB Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Alphabet folds Nest into Google to better take on Amazon Alexa
Samsung Galaxy S9 leak reveals new 'DeX Pad' dock
CPU Price Watch: 9900K Incoming, Ryzen Cuts
Android Messages update could bring texting to the browser
How to customize your Facebook News Feed so it's less annoying
Apple is rejecting apps from the App Store for using emoji
Wordle today: The answer and hints for April 14, 2025
Chromebooks may soon have Google Assistant standard
Patched Desktop PC: Meltdown & Spectre Benchmarked
Star Wars is still mostly white dudes behind the camera
接受PR>=1、BR>=1,流量相当,内容相关类链接。