Rose McGowan is Watch Erotica Manila Episode 2not interested in your symbolic protests, Hollywood.
On Saturday, McGowan turned her attention to Meryl Streep and others who reportedly support a rising push for female actors to attend the upcoming Golden Globes awards show clad in all black. The gesture is intended as a protest of the sexual misconduct that's run rampant through Hollywood for decades.
SEE ALSO: Alyssa Milano slams Matt Damon for his misguided comments on sexual misconductAn incensed McGowan lashed out on Twitter at "actresses, like Meryl Streep," for planning a silent protest.
"YOUR SILENCE is THE problem," McGowan wrote. "You’ll accept a fake award breathlessly & affect no real change. I despise your hypocrisy."
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
She then suggested that the protesters all wear Marchesa, the fashion brand co-founded by Georgina Chapman, as an indirect jab at the protesters. Chapman is married to Harvey Weinstein, the caustic Hollywood producer who allegedly engaged in sexually predatory behavior for decades.
Chapman and Weinstein separated earlier this year, but McGowan's reference to the fashion brand drives her message home: The act of simply attending the Golden Globes, in her mind -- and, it's worth noting, the minds of many others -- makes you complicit with the bad behavior.
Her tweet is all the more striking given the "silent" aspect of this protest. No one has actually come out and explained the intent. The original report, via The Morning Breath, and subsequent confirmations from other outlets, like People, all hinge on anonymous sources.
There's little doubt that some contingent of familiar names is working behind the scenes to make this protest happen. But the apparent unwillingness among them to publicly own this plan -- as evidenced by the anonymous sourcing -- gives added merit to McGowan's take.
The response to her tweet has been decidedly mixed. Some are criticizing McGowan for attacking other women who have made the choice to protest without speaking up. Others agree, and double down by suggesting that not showing up at all would be a more appropriate act of protest.
This is a challenging situation. Who's right and who's wrong is largely a question of perspective. While most can probably agree that pushing back using any resources available against a culture that protects sexual misconduct and reinforces gender inequality is a good thing, a debate like this only proves that it's never as black and white as one side vs. the other.
(Editor: {typename type="name"/})
This Swedish punk band has released their own typeface made from urine
iOS 11 is already on almost 15 percent of Apple devices
Here's 27.6 billion reasons why Facebook wants to regulate itself
DDR4 Memory at 4000 MT/s, Does It Make a Difference?
For the mainland U.S., Hurricane Maria's path is now a waiting game
iOS 11 is already on almost 15 percent of Apple devices
PSA: Anyone can record and save your snaps forever on iOS 11
Useful or Little Known Android Features
Ron Howard drops biggest hint yet that the Han Solo movie could answer an infamous question
The strangeness of Japan's decision to start openly hunting whales
The original, massive Xbox controller is coming back... with a mysterious screen in the center
接受PR>=1、BR>=1,流量相当,内容相关类链接。